Advertise with fastmoving.co.za
 
 

Food crisis is much bigger than simply tinkering with zero-rating VAT.
Food crisis is much bigger than simply tinkering with zero-rating VAT.

Food crisis is much bigger than simply tinkering with zero-rating VAT

ECONOMIC NEWS

By Linda Ensor - Aug 13th 2018, 13:54

The government should stop tinkering with zero-rating of the VAT system and rather focus its efforts on regulating food prices and increasing wages and social grants, according to Pietermaritzburg Economic Justice and Dignity Group founder Julie Smith.
 

She said the food crisis was much bigger than simply tinkering around with zero rating. "Households don’t have enough money to put food on the table, which is leading to a massive health crisis, and we need to look beyond the VAT angle to see how we can make food more affordable," Smith said in response to the release Friday of a report on zero-rating additional items.

The report was prepared by a panel of experts led by Stellenbosch University professor Ingrid Woolard. It recommended that white bread, bread flour, cake flour, sanitary products, school uniforms and nappies be zero-rated from VAT in addition to the 19 items already zero-rated. The panel estimated that its recommended items would represent a loss to the fiscus of about R4bn in VAT revenue foregone.

The panel was appointed to look into zero-rating additional items to mitigate the effect on the poor of the one percentage point increase in the VAT rate from 14% to 15% which was announced in the budget and which took effect from April 1. The VAT increase was strongly opposed by trade unionists, nongovernmental organisations (NGOs) and community organisations as being a retrogressive measure that would have a negative effect on the poor.

Smith was sceptical of the whole endeavour of the panel because she did not believe its recommendations would make much difference to the poor.

"We were not expecting any grand solution from this review panel. It might make it a little easier but it is not fundamentally going to change the affordability of foodstuffs," she said.

Zero-rated foods were not affordable for the poor so it did not help much in just adding to the basket. Also, the food purchases of poor and low-income households were not restricted to zero-rated foods. In fact, more was spent on taxable foods.

Smith said the priority investment that should be made in SA right now was to ensure that families could eat properly.

"It is much easier and more efficient to put money in people’s pockets and let them decide how best to spend it. We have to try to find ways to increase income or we have to decrease the cost of goods and services through regulation."

North West University business school economist Prof Raymond Parsons said the panel’s recommendations posed a wider challenge to the existing fiscal framework.

"The acid test of any eventual decision on the panel’s recommendations, given the present vulnerable state of SA’s public finances on both the spending and revenue sides, will be its affordability. Any potential weakening of the tax base through tax concessions, whatever their other merits, must, therefore, be handled with great caution and above all such decisions need to be consistent with the existing fiscal framework," he said.

"The limited room to manoeuvre in these matters again emphasises why SA needs much higher growth and employment rates to create more fiscal space and reduce poverty."

Parsons also raised the question of whether the panel’s proposed VAT relief would significantly benefit poor households in present circumstances in SA or whether there were better options to assist them.

He noted that the Katz commission on tax reform and the more recent Davis tax committee had both resisted further concessions on zero-rated items and instead advocated stronger programmes on the expenditure side of the budget to assist poorer households.

"A national food-stamp system, for example, such as [that which] successfully operates in the US, should be fully explored for SA to provide more targeted relief," Parsons suggested.


Business Live 

Related News

Retail sales remain muted with consumers under pressure
20/09/2019 - 14:31
Retail sales for July marginally declined to 2 percent year on year as sales growth continued to reflect a muted demand in South Africa, with consumers’ discretionary income under strain.

4 reasons to be hopeful about South Africa’s economy
12/09/2019 - 14:40
Markets responded positively to South Africa’s economic growth rebounding in the second quarter, up 3.1%, and 0.9% for the year to June 2019.

Smarter mobility key to a sustainable South Africa
11/09/2019 - 13:19
The World Economic Forum has revealed that by 2050, 70% of the world’s population will be living and operating in urban areas. Considering the resultant congestion and air pollution, which are already challenges requiring mitigation in 2019, mobility and energy should be top of mind for those making the shift towards cities of the future.

Manufacturing production shrinks for second month in July
11/09/2019 - 13:01
Manufacturing production recorded its second consecutive contraction in July, in line with analysts’ expectations.

Eskom: The largest threat to the stability of the SA economy
10/09/2019 - 09:45
On Tuesday 23 July, South African Finance Minister Tito Mboweni tabled a bill before the National Assembly which would see national state-owned power utility Eskom benefit from an allocation of R59 billion over the next three years.