Advertise with

Tiger Brands’ immunity queried
Tiger Brands’ immunity queried

Tiger Brands’ immunity queried

MARKETING NEWS - Apr 4th 2016, 10:46

The long-running probe into the milling cartel on Thursday encountered an obstacle that could strip Tiger Brands of the immunity it received from the Competition Commission for providing information on maize price fixing. 

Nelspruit-based milling company Blinkwater on Thursday challenged the commission’s decision to exempt Tiger Brands from being penalised for its involvement in fixing the price of white maize.

Blinkwater, which makes Super B maize meal, argued before the Competition Tribunal that the commission went against its own leniency policy by granting Tiger Brands immunity when leniency had already been awarded to Premier Foods.

In terms of the leniency policy, the commission could grant immunity to only one company per product under investigation, it said.

The fact that Premier Foods had already received immunity for its involvement in the white maize cartel made it unlawful for the commission to exempt Tiger Brands as well, argued Blinkwater’s legal team.

Therefore, the case against Blinkwater should be dropped, its lawyers maintained.

Representative for the Competition Commission Itumeleng Lesofe said the statutory body tasked with investigating uncompetitive business practices was within its rights to grant Tiger Brands, the maker of Ace maize meal, immunity as it had come out with new information that had not been provided by Premier Foods.

Mr Lesofe said Blinkwater had a gripe because new information supplied by Tiger Brands had implicated it.

"Our leniency policy is not rigid. The Commission can exercise discretion if there are good reasons to grant immunity to the second applicant, said Mr Lesofe.

"This is such a circumstance."

The Competition Tribunal adjourned the hearing on Thursday and indicated it will decide on the matter in due course.

In a separate case Tiger Brands, Pioneer Foods, and Foodcorp were found guilty of colluding to raise the price of bread in 2009.

The bread producers were fined a total of about R338m.From DFM Publishers (Pty) Ltd 

Related News

Tiger Brands still reeling from listeriosis aftershock
26/11/2019 - 09:41
Tiger Brands continued to feel the effects of the listeriosis outbreak in the year to the end of September after the food producer suffered an impairment charge in its value-added meat products (Vamp), following a slower-than-anticipated recovery in the division.

Processed meats units continue to take toll on Tiger Brands
22/11/2019 - 15:10
Food producer Tiger Brands, which is still reeling from the backlash of the listeriosis crisis, said the slow recovery in its value-added meats businesses ensured operating income fell by a fifth in its year to end-September.

Tiger Brands considers disposing of value-added meat business
11/11/2019 - 09:22
SA’s largest food producer, Tiger Brands, is considering disposing of its value-added meat products business (Vamp), saying on Friday it had determined it was not an ideal fit in the business.

Regulation of online and mobile gambling in Africa must gather pace
29/10/2019 - 10:20
The gambling industry in Africa has been busy recently following the ICE Africa and Big African Summit events. These explored the current state of legal gambling within the continent and included conferences by established industry professionals.

Pick n Pay unveils its revamped "On Nicol" flagship store
18/10/2019 - 10:59
Pick n Pay’s flagship store On Nicol officially welcomed customers after a comprehensive revamp. The refurbished store has an exciting array of new offerings with the very best in retail concepts developed in South Africa and from around the world. Customers can expect an enhanced fresh food experience, a huge focus on product quality, a much-improved range, innovative third-party services, and refreshed customer service.